Comments Off

by Jennifer Laycock

If someone told you only there was a place where people might talk about your product and 23 percent of the people who saw that conversation would be more likely to buy your product…would you think that was a good thing? I would. In fact, I’d very much want to find a way to get in front of that audience. That’s why, I’m a little confused to hear some people claiming the 23% number isn’t significant.

In fact, in Media Post’s coverage of the study Pollara executive vice president and general manager Robert Hutton said “This shows that popularity doesn’t always equate to credibility. Marketers may have to reconsider who the real influencers are out there.”

Lisa Barone summed up my response to this statement in a great post over at the Bruce Clay Blog by writing.

Give me a second here. My entire brain just exploded onto the floor.

(Personally, I would have gone with the whole “my head asplode” bit, but Lisa’s version works too.)

I just find myself wondering how anyone could look at a number that says 23% of people are MORE likely to buy something if person X talks about it and use that figure to decide person X isn’t really so important after all. I mean let’s think about this. They’re called “influencers” not “purchase dictators.”

Marshall Kirkpatrick points out:

The new data from Pollara does say that people use online social networks to make buying decisions, but they trust the advice of their friends and family on those networks far more than they do high-profile bloggers.

Now, why anyone would be surprised by that is beyond me. Of course I’m going to trust the recommendation of a friend or family member more than I’m going to trust some random stranger who has a blog I happen to read. Is anyone really surprised by that? Really and truly? Of course not.

But here’s the thing. Bloggers and social media conversations are still absolutely essential when it comes to promoting products. There are two key reasons for this.

1.) Because bloggers are trusted MORE than the companies who own the products. Study after study shows people put more trust in bloggers than they do in company ads. Bloggers are third party sources. As long as they are blogging based on their interest and not on a check showing up in their mailboxes, their posts are viewed as unbiased commentary about a product. If the product happens to be in an area a blogger has built up a reputation as an expert in, chances are good the blog post will carry some weight.

In other words, people trust friends and family a lot, bloggers who have earned credibility a bit and companies who are hawking their wares very little. If you asked me, that’s exactly what I’d expect to hear.

If you are a company and you know a blogger’s word is going to be trusted more fully than your own word, you’d be crazy not to try and get bloggers to talk about you.

2.) Because it’s next to impossible to reach everyone’s friends and family but it’s pretty easy to reach bloggers. Of course you’d love it if you could make sure everyone in the world had a trusted friend or family member that already used and loved your product. That’s not going to happen though, is it? It makes sense then that rather than go after the impossible, you’d focus on what you can do.

What you can do is figure out which bloggers are read the most and work on getting them to talk about you on the theory that while it’s not as good as “friends and family” it’s a whole lot better than “selling it yourself.” Sometimes “it’s not the ideal, but it’s what we can do” is an acceptable marketing strategy. (Sometimes it’s a lucrative one.)

On the other hand, let companies around the world start thinking blogger reviews and mentions aren’t everything they’re cracked up to be. That will make it easier for the rest of us to keep marketing our stuff.

Learn something from this post?
Come and experience Search Engine Guide style teaching in person! Join us for our first ever Small Business Marketing Unleashed Conference in Houston, Texas on April 21st and 22nd.

Comments Off

by Jennifer Laycock

If someone told you only there was a place where people might talk about your product and 23 percent of the people who saw that conversation would be more likely to buy your product…would you think that was a good thing? I would. In fact, I’d very much want to find a way to get in front of that audience. That’s why, I’m a little confused to hear some people claiming the 23% number isn’t significant.

In fact, in Media Post’s coverage of the study Pollara executive vice president and general manager Robert Hutton said “This shows that popularity doesn’t always equate to credibility. Marketers may have to reconsider who the real influencers are out there.”

Lisa Barone summed up my response to this statement in a great post over at the Bruce Clay Blog by writing.

Give me a second here. My entire brain just exploded onto the floor.

(Personally, I would have gone with the whole “my head asplode” bit, but Lisa’s version works too.)

I just find myself wondering how anyone could look at a number that says 23% of people are MORE likely to buy something if person X talks about it and use that figure to decide person X isn’t really so important after all. I mean let’s think about this. They’re called “influencers” not “purchase dictators.”

Marshall Kirkpatrick points out:

The new data from Pollara does say that people use online social networks to make buying decisions, but they trust the advice of their friends and family on those networks far more than they do high-profile bloggers.

Now, why anyone would be surprised by that is beyond me. Of course I’m going to trust the recommendation of a friend or family member more than I’m going to trust some random stranger who has a blog I happen to read. Is anyone really surprised by that? Really and truly? Of course not.

But here’s the thing. Bloggers and social media conversations are still absolutely essential when it comes to promoting products. There are two key reasons for this.

1.) Because bloggers are trusted MORE than the companies who own the products. Study after study shows people put more trust in bloggers than they do in company ads. Bloggers are third party sources. As long as they are blogging based on their interest and not on a check showing up in their mailboxes, their posts are viewed as unbiased commentary about a product. If the product happens to be in an area a blogger has built up a reputation as an expert in, chances are good the blog post will carry some weight.

In other words, people trust friends and family a lot, bloggers who have earned credibility a bit and companies who are hawking their wares very little. If you asked me, that’s exactly what I’d expect to hear.

If you are a company and you know a blogger’s word is going to be trusted more fully than your own word, you’d be crazy not to try and get bloggers to talk about you.

2.) Because it’s next to impossible to reach everyone’s friends and family but it’s pretty easy to reach bloggers. Of course you’d love it if you could make sure everyone in the world had a trusted friend or family member that already used and loved your product. That’s not going to happen though, is it? It makes sense then that rather than go after the impossible, you’d focus on what you can do.

What you can do is figure out which bloggers are read the most and work on getting them to talk about you on the theory that while it’s not as good as “friends and family” it’s a whole lot better than “selling it yourself.” Sometimes “it’s not the ideal, but it’s what we can do” is an acceptable marketing strategy. (Sometimes it’s a lucrative one.)

On the other hand, let companies around the world start thinking blogger reviews and mentions aren’t everything they’re cracked up to be. That will make it easier for the rest of us to keep marketing our stuff.

Learn something from this post?
Come and experience Search Engine Guide style teaching in person! Join us for our first ever Small Business Marketing Unleashed Conference in Houston, Texas on April 21st and 22nd.

Comments Off

by Jennifer Laycock

If you run an ecommerce site selling products that can also be found elsewhere, putting your price in your paid search ad could go a long way toward improving your conversion rates. That’s the point Jennifer Slegg makes in a post on pay per click conversion rates and ROI at her blog today. Jennifer reminds readers that while many companies spend their time focusing on driving clicks, they would be better served looking at ROI and considering how the information in their ad impacts both click through rates and conversion rates.

According to Jennifer, most ecommerce sites are driving a lot of useless clicks from bargain shoppers. She explains:

When you are selling a product that is not exclusive to your site, especially with high-ticket items or items that people tend to shop around for to find the best pricing, you end up paying for clicks from people who are just checking to see if you have the best price or not, and they don’t have the intention of buying from you right then… unless you were fortunate enough to be the last site they checked (which goes against regular PPC techniques where you want to be the first click) AND you had the best price. And obviously, you will have lower conversions and a low ROI (return on investment) when you do have a high percentage of non-buyers.

It’s a good reminder and one that she backs up with some good insight. While including prices certainly doesn’t work for every industry, there are times where it’s a good idea to consider including prices in your posts. For more on this topic, check out her post on the most important pay per click metric and my own posts on The Number One Rule of Pay Per Click and Five Common Paid Search Mistakes That Can Sink Your Campaign.

Learn something from this post?
Come and experience Search Engine Guide style teaching in person! Join us for our first ever Small Business Marketing Unleashed Conference in Houston, Texas on April 21st and 22nd.

Comments Off

by Jennifer Laycock

If you run an ecommerce site selling products that can also be found elsewhere, putting your price in your paid search ad could go a long way toward improving your conversion rates. That’s the point Jennifer Slegg makes in a post on pay per click conversion rates and ROI at her blog today. Jennifer reminds readers that while many companies spend their time focusing on driving clicks, they would be better served looking at ROI and considering how the information in their ad impacts both click through rates and conversion rates.

According to Jennifer, most ecommerce sites are driving a lot of useless clicks from bargain shoppers. She explains:

When you are selling a product that is not exclusive to your site, especially with high-ticket items or items that people tend to shop around for to find the best pricing, you end up paying for clicks from people who are just checking to see if you have the best price or not, and they don’t have the intention of buying from you right then… unless you were fortunate enough to be the last site they checked (which goes against regular PPC techniques where you want to be the first click) AND you had the best price. And obviously, you will have lower conversions and a low ROI (return on investment) when you do have a high percentage of non-buyers.

It’s a good reminder and one that she backs up with some good insight. While including prices certainly doesn’t work for every industry, there are times where it’s a good idea to consider including prices in your posts. For more on this topic, check out her post on the most important pay per click metric and my own posts on The Number One Rule of Pay Per Click and Five Common Paid Search Mistakes That Can Sink Your Campaign.

Learn something from this post?
Come and experience Search Engine Guide style teaching in person! Join us for our first ever Small Business Marketing Unleashed Conference in Houston, Texas on April 21st and 22nd.

Comments Off

by Jennifer Laycock

While search engines are pretty good at finding web sites and getting their content indexed, many site owners have no idea their web sites can be created in a way that looks good to people, but can’t be read by search engines. If your site is built entirely in Flash, relies too heavily on Javascript or uses drop down boxes and forms to let people find your content, the search engines may be missing out on your content.

(SEM Bootcamp articles are no-frills content designed to bring small business owners up to speed on the concepts and techniques needed to market their businesses online.)

Search engine spiders do an impressive job of finding and indexing the content on web site around the net, but there are still a few stumbling blocks that could be keeping them from indexing the content on YOUR site. Thankfully, it only takes a few seconds of your time to make sure an easy to fix problem isn’t keeping your site content from being indexed.

Search Engines Are Smart, But They Have Limits

While there are several things that can trip up a search engine, most small business sites that aren’t being indexed suffer from one of the following problems. They’ve either mistakenly set their robots.txt file to “noindex,” have an all Flash or graphic site, or rely on programming like frames or drop down boxes for navigation. Of course there’s no sense worrying about which of those issues is the problem until you know if there’s a problem to worry about.

The Spider Simulator is Your Friend

The good news is there’s a very simple way to find out if there is a problem on your site. Thanks to handy little tools called “spider simulators,” you can view your web site the same way a search engine’s spider would. The Spider Simulator offered by Webconfs.com is a great, free tool that will help you figure out if your web site is working against you when it comes to search engine rankings.

simulator.gif

To use a spider simulator, you simply type the URL of your web site into the query box and hit enter. The program will run a quick search of your web site and will then show you what information it was able to collect. These programs are designed to read your web site the same way a search engine would, so more often than not if a spider simulator can’t read your content, a search engine can’t either.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at two small businesses here in central Ohio and find out how their web sites fare in a spider simulator.

Example #1: Market Blooms Columbus, a florist in Columbus, Ohio

When I enter the URL for this local florist, the spider simulator sends back some pretty disturbing results.

florist.gif

According to the spider simulator, there’s only one brief phrase that can be read. No links, no content…pretty much nothing other than a handful of worthless meta keyword tags. With that in mind, let’s take a look at the web site.

marketbloom.jpg

It’s not a bad looking site. It tells what the company does, it has a picture of the owners, it has a phone number and email address. It even gives the address of the business and tells you a little bit about their offerings. Unfortunately, it’s not sharing any of that information with the search engines.

Why? Their address, phone number and description of their business are all part of a single graphic. Since search engines can’t read graphics, the search engines have no idea what the site is about. It would be easy for Market Blooms Columbus to solve this. An afternoon spent making some changes to the site would go a long way toward helping engines like Google have a little more information. Chances are high this site could rank for phrases like “Columbus Ohio florist,” “north market florist” and “Columbus flowers” if they’d only spend a little time making sure search engines could read the content on their site.

In fact, when I run a search for “north market florist columbus,” their site doesn’t appear. If they’d simply redo the site so they were using some graphics and some text, they’d probably have no problem showing up on the first page for that phrase.

Example #2: Bloomtastic, a florist in Dublin, Ohio

If I enter their URL into the spider simulator, I get quite a bit more data back.

florist2.gif

For the Bloomtastic site we actually get page content and tons of links. It’s not a lot of content, but it is content and there are some keywords in there. Additionally, seeing all those links tells us the the search engine can find its way deeper into the site to dig up and index more content. Since every page of a web site is another chance to earn search rankings, this is essential to your site. If you have more than one page on your site and a spider check like this one isn’t showing those links, you need to have someone look at how your links are coded.

Sure enough, if you run a search on Google for “Columbus Ohio florist, the Bloomtastic site ranks second.

Graphics Aren’t The Only Problem

In the first example, the big issue was an all graphic site. That does happen now and then to small businesses, but these days it’s all Flash sites that tend to be the more common offender. While search engines are getting better at reading the content in Flash, they’re not quite there yet. (Run a check in the simulator on the Diet Coke site and the only link it picks up is the “get Flash now” link.)

Another common problem is a robots.txt file that accidentally got set to block indexing instead of allow indexing. This one is super easy to fix, especially if you read through the search engine marketing bootcamp article on creating your robots.txt file.

The last one I see pop up pretty frequently is a site that relies on drop down menus or forms to let people navigate around the site. Generally this doesn’t keep the entire site from being indexed, but it can block large amounts of content. If you have any content that can only be reached by a drop down box or by filling out a form and clicking an enter button, then chances are pretty high the search engines can’t find it and haven’t indexed it. Search engine spiders can’t fill out forms like humans do; unless you give them a direct text link, the content might as well not even exist.

There’s no doubt there are other things that can cause problems with the spiders, but these are some of the quickest and easiest to check for. The good news is they all have remedies. The first step is finding out you have a problem. If you do, it’s time to contact someone you trust so they can take a look at your site and help you figure out what the problem is.

Learn something from this post?
Come and experience Search Engine Guide style teaching in person! Join us for our first ever Small Business Marketing Unleashed Conference in Houston, Texas on April 21st and 22nd.

Comments Off

Below is what happened in search today, as reported on
Search Engine Land and from other
places across the web.

From Search Engine Land:


  • HP Promoting T-Shirts Promoting YouTube Videos, Yahoo Nixes “The 9,” Craigslist Reaching For $100 Million, Google Grants & More

    Given that we were unwittingly ensnared by Mike Blumenthal’s authentic sounding April Fools post earlier this week, we’re being a bit more careful and reading items more closely these days. However, one article from Bloomberg that almost reads like an April Fools item discusses a novel program on Google’s YouTube…

  • SMX Advanced Keynotes: Microsoft’s Kevin Johnson and Google’s Matt Cutts

    We’re very pleased that Microsoft’s Kevin Johnson and Google’s Matt Cutts will be featured presenters at Search Marketing Expo — SMX Advanced in Seattle June 3-4. You can see the full SMX Advanced agenda here or click here to register. Or, keep reading to learn more about the keynotes….

  • Do You Need SEO Standards For Your Company?

    The debate on the need for SEO standards continues, with no clear industry-wide consensus. Without a doubt, however, your company should have SEO standards and guidelines that convey your company’s stance on SEO—namely, clearly spelling out acceptable practices and perhaps even more importantly, definitely drawing boundaries that cannot be…

  • Video Search & Relevance: Important Bedfellows

    As I wrote in last month’s column, video offers enormous opportunity for local SMBs to market online more effectively. Admittedly, some folks differ with that point of view. For example, one commenter wrote that “although the technology exists for businesses to deploy video online, SMBs can’t compete with big…

  • One Day You’re Optimized, The Next Day You’re A Spammer

    It is no secret that human review has been playing a bigger role at Google over the past couple years. And we are emotional beings… no matter how logical the guidelines may be, emotions cause human errors. But not all sites that get penalized are penalized in error. Many…

  • Real Estate Search Engine Zillow Opens “Mortgage Marketplace”

    Zillow doesn’t see itself as a real estate “vertical.” Instead it regards itself as a media company that creates advertising opportunities around what is arguably the most significant “life events” purchase: buying a home. In that spirit the company is developing numerous interesting marketing vehicles aimed at consumers in all…

  • Google News: Fact & Fiction Edition

    The Google News blog has an excellent post on the truths and myths of how Google News works. Here is the short version:…

Search News From Around The Web:

Applications & Portal Features

Local, Maps & Mobile

Link Building

Paid Search & Contextual

Searching

SEM Industry

SEO & SEM

Social Media

Video, Music & Image Search

Recent Hot Items From Sphinn, Our Social News Sharing Site:

Comments Off

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today, through the eyes of the Search Engine Roundtable and other search forums on the web.

Comments Off

Given that we were unwittingly ensnared by Mike Blumenthal’s authentic sounding April Fools post earlier this week, we’re being a bit more careful and reading items more closely these days. However, one article from Bloomberg that almost reads like an April Fools item discusses a novel program on Google’s YouTube in which computer and printer maker Hewlett Packard is encouraging people to make T-shirts to promote their YouTube videos (presumably as a way to get them to use more printer ink).

Click to continue reading…

Comments Off

Carr’s new book explores the future of computing and its implications for business and society. He’ll discuss some of those topics today during his opening keynote at SES New York.

Comments Off

We’re very pleased that Microsoft’s Kevin Johnson and Google’s Matt Cutts will be featured presenters at Search Marketing Expo — SMX Advanced in Seattle June 3-4.

You can see the full SMX Advanced agenda here or click here to register. Or, keep reading to learn more about the keynotes.

Click to continue reading…

Comments Off

In House - A Column From Search Engine Land The debate on the need for SEO standards continues, with no clear industry-wide consensus. Without a doubt, however, your company should have SEO standards and guidelines that convey your company’s stance on SEO—namely, clearly spelling out acceptable practices and perhaps even more importantly, definitely drawing boundaries that cannot be breached regardless of whether they may increase traffic to your site.

Click to continue reading…

Comments Off

As I wrote in last month’s column, video offers enormous opportunity for local SMBs to market online more effectively. Admittedly, some folks differ with that point of view. For example, one commenter wrote that “although the technology exists for businesses to deploy video online, SMBs can’t compete with big brands on creative work.” This person argued that it will take more than lowering the barrier-to-entry cost of video for SMBs to compete with bigger brands.

I beg to differ. Why? From what we have seen, successful online video advertising involves more than glitzy, expensively-produced commercials. Successful video ads offer relevant, informative, and authentic content about a brand, product, and service: In short, the type of content that search engines love. Also, SMBs have the mobility, which larger competitors may lack, to optimize and adjust their videos for greater relevance, ultimately making them even better for search engines.

Click to continue reading…

Comments Off


100% Organic - A Column From Search Engine Land
It is no secret that human review has been playing a bigger role at Google over the past couple years. And we are emotional beings… no matter how logical the guidelines may be, emotions cause human errors. But not all sites that get penalized are penalized in error. Many deserve it.

Sadly, Google’s guidelines for its “remote quality raters,” people who are paid by Google to help with quality control, are clearer than the public guidelines for webmasters. Why? Google is using these remote quality raters as an effective and efficient piece of the relevancy algorithm.

Click to continue reading…

Comments Off

Following March’s update, WebmasterWorld members talk about the newest updates to the Google algorithm, including the previously discussed Dewey update.

Some observations include front page rankings that appear to be delisted (or “dumped way back,” as one person puts it). He notes that one of his websites that has been up for over a decade is now totally gone with the exception of 2 pages that were updated in 2001.

News results also seem strange. A 2003 CNN story is occupying the #10 position in search, observes another member. Old documents are making their way to the forefront, whereas new documents are hidden.

Many people are noting multiple subdomains occupying more than one spot in the top 10.

The shuffle is definitely a big concern — some results from the top spots are being relocated. Someone calls this “crazy swings.” Sounds about right.

Matt Cutts is still looking for feedback about these changes, and he has been checking out the forum thread.

Forum discussion continues at WebmasterWorld.